My years of experience as a printmaker set me up for a certain point of view that is very different from that which I now find myself interested in. The availability of websites that will print and sell original images on line is very tempting so it isn’t very hard for me to come around to the opinion that it is fine to reproduce original art and sell the prints just as long as the buying public knows the difference between original art and a reproduction. These web sites do all of the work. The only thing the artist needs to do is set up their own gallery on the site and upload high quality images. Fine Art America is one such site that specializes in printing art for posters and framed giclee prints on fine paper and canvas. Zazzle also reproduces art for posters and prints as well as for many other products I’ve mentioned previously. A new site I have just joined is Red Bubble. I haven’t set up my images on this site yet, but it looks very promising.
I do have a problem with artists who sign and number these reproductions and create the illusion that the individual who purchases these object is getting something special. It is special in that it is an image they like and want to decorate their home with it, but it isn’t special in terms of increased value because there is a signature on in. And the number don’t mean a thing. Unfortunately, there are some well known artists who have this kind of art on the market. This is where the deception can occur.



This is an example of the flower paintings I created in 2006. In fact, I spent the entire year making small paintings of flowers. When I look at the entire body of work, I see that the use of shapes and composition is not very different from that which I used during the 30 years of abstractions I painted.
